USE CASE

SAP automation.
Proven in 12 weeks.

A successful proof of concept for an Australian enterprise, led by Syed Haque using Tricentis Tosca and exploring Agentic AI.

12weeks

From baseline
to a clear business case

PoC successfully completed

THE CHALLENGE

Reduce the burden of repeat regression.

Manual SAP testing tied up business specialists and made repeated releases labour intensive. The organisation needed evidence that automation could work in its environment and justify wider adoption.

SYED’S ROLE

Connect technical proof to business value.

Lead the PoC, agree success measures, coordinate business and technical teams, and translate execution evidence into ROI analysis and a practical adoption recommendation.

The PoC journey

01

Baseline

Agree scope, success criteria and the manual testing baseline.

Clear measures
02

Validate

Build and run Tosca automation. Review feasibility, repeatability and effort.

Execution evidence
03

Decide

Assess results, model value and present an adoption path to leadership.

Informed investment decision

Technical proof

SAP automation feasibility demonstrated.

Faster repeat testing

Shorter regression execution demonstrated in the PoC.

Less SME involvement

A smaller execution team for recurring regression.

Decision clarity

Evidence and assumptions brought together for leadership.

This case describes Syed’s personal delivery leadership at a prior engagement. The client is anonymous; the PoC is not presented as a project delivered by Shinebright Consulting. Wider rollout and modelled returns are not claimed as realised outcomes.

UNDERSTANDING THE VALUE

What repeatable automation can change.

The following charts use synthetic figures from our client-safe showcase. They explain the value model and are not the client’s measured results or forecasts.

ILLUSTRATIVE · SYNTHETIC DATA

Less effort on every repeat run.

Compare the example manual and automated approaches.

Regression cycle duration in days

Manual1.5 days
Tosca automation0.4 days

73%shorter regression cycle in this illustration

Repeat execution only. Automation build and maintenance effort must also be included in an investment assessment.

ILLUSTRATIVE · SYNTHETIC DATA

Reuse builds the business case.

Example cumulative ROI over five years.

Illustrative paybackYear 3

Depends on scope, adoption, reuse and investment. Modelled capacity value is not automatic cash saving or a guaranteed return.

View the illustrative figures and assumptions
Synthetic comparison data
MeasureManualAutomated
Regression cycle1.5 days0.4 days
Execution per test24 minutes3 minutes
Team effort per cycle67.5 hours3.0 hours

Illustrative five-year model

Cumulative ROI: −49%, −14%, +19%, +40%, +53% (rounded). Model assumptions: 8× portfolio scale; 7 retest cycles per year; adoption of 30%, 60%, 90%, 100%, 100%.

Source: Shinebright’s client-safe showcase, August 2026. All comparison and ROI figures are synthetic. The actual case facts presented above are the successful 12-week PoC, Syed’s role and qualitative outcomes.

Considering SAP automation?
Start with a focused PoC and a measurable baseline.

Discuss an automation PoC