A successful proof of concept for an Australian enterprise, led by Syed Haque using Tricentis Tosca and exploring Agentic AI.
12weeks
From baseline to a clear business case
PoC successfully completed
THE CHALLENGE
Reduce the burden of repeat regression.
Manual SAP testing tied up business specialists and made repeated releases labour intensive. The organisation needed evidence that automation could work in its environment and justify wider adoption.
SYED’S ROLE
Connect technical proof to business value.
Lead the PoC, agree success measures, coordinate business and technical teams, and translate execution evidence into ROI analysis and a practical adoption recommendation.
The PoC journey
01
Baseline
Agree scope, success criteria and the manual testing baseline.
Clear measures02
Validate
Build and run Tosca automation. Review feasibility, repeatability and effort.
Execution evidence03
Decide
Assess results, model value and present an adoption path to leadership.
Informed investment decision
Technical proof
SAP automation feasibility demonstrated.
Faster repeat testing
Shorter regression execution demonstrated in the PoC.
Less SME involvement
A smaller execution team for recurring regression.
Decision clarity
Evidence and assumptions brought together for leadership.
This case describes Syed’s personal delivery leadership at a prior engagement. The client is anonymous; the PoC is not presented as a project delivered by Shinebright Consulting. Wider rollout and modelled returns are not claimed as realised outcomes.
UNDERSTANDING THE VALUE
What repeatable automation can change.
The following charts use synthetic figures from our client-safe showcase. They explain the value model and are not the client’s measured results or forecasts.
ILLUSTRATIVE · SYNTHETIC DATA
Less effort on every repeat run.
Compare the example manual and automated approaches.
Regression cycle duration in days
Manual1.5 days
Tosca automation0.4 days
01.5 days
73%shorter regression cycle in this illustration
Repeat execution only. Automation build and maintenance effort must also be included in an investment assessment.
ILLUSTRATIVE · SYNTHETIC DATA
Reuse builds the business case.
Example cumulative ROI over five years.
Cumulative ROI (%)
60300−30−60
−49%−14%+19%+40%+53%
Year 1Year 2Year 3Year 4Year 5
Illustrative paybackYear 3
Depends on scope, adoption, reuse and investment. Modelled capacity value is not automatic cash saving or a guaranteed return.
View the illustrative figures and assumptions
Synthetic comparison data
Measure
Manual
Automated
Regression cycle
1.5 days
0.4 days
Execution per test
24 minutes
3 minutes
Team effort per cycle
67.5 hours
3.0 hours
Illustrative five-year model
Cumulative ROI: −49%, −14%, +19%, +40%, +53% (rounded). Model assumptions: 8× portfolio scale; 7 retest cycles per year; adoption of 30%, 60%, 90%, 100%, 100%.
Source: Shinebright’s client-safe showcase, August 2026. All comparison and ROI figures are synthetic. The actual case facts presented above are the successful 12-week PoC, Syed’s role and qualitative outcomes.
Considering SAP automation? Start with a focused PoC and a measurable baseline.